Talk to an expertProduct tour

228 Park Ave South, PMB 71905 New York, NY 10003

Product

  • Leasing
  • Maintenance
  • Vendor Management
  • Resident
  • AI Harness
  • Integrations
  • Data Platform
  • Field Operations
  • Call Center
  • Centralization
  • Revenue Management
  • Reports

Solutions

  • Consulting
  • Asset Management
  • Senior Living
  • Student Housing
  • Affordable Housing
  • Hospitality

Resources

  • Articles
  • Glossary

Company

  • About
  • Contact Us

Socials

  • LinkedIn

Industry members

  • NAA
  • NMHC

© Accolade. All rights reserved.

  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy

Built in New York and Bangalore

Back to Glossary

SOC 2 Compliance

SOC 2 compliance explained for multifamily leaders: what SOC 2 reports assess, how Type I and Type II differ, and why they matter in vendor risk.

Definition

SOC 2 compliance means an organization’s data security controls have been evaluated against the AICPA Trust Services Criteria: security, availability, confidentiality, processing integrity, and privacy. A SOC 2 Type I report looks at controls at a specific point in time, while a SOC 2 Type II report evaluates how those controls operate over a period of time. For multifamily teams, it is most often used to assess whether service providers have appropriate safeguards for resident, applicant, payment, and operational data.

Example

Before approving a new resident communications platform, a multifamily operations team asks the provider for its SOC 2 Type II report, reviews whether the report covers systems that handle applicant and resident data, and documents any follow-up questions as part of vendor due diligence.

Why it matters

SOC 2 compliance helps operations leaders make more informed decisions about technology partners that access sensitive data or critical systems. It supports vendor due diligence, contract review, and ongoing monitoring by providing an independent audit report rather than relying only on a questionnaire or verbal assurances. This matters because apartment firms may still face breach notifications, regulatory scrutiny, legal costs, and reputational harm when a supplier mishandles data.
‹ SuperheatSmart Triage ›
2026